[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa6e6832-6bbc-87d7-9937-b18aec83a2ff@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:30:37 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] pwm: meson: move pwm_set_chip_data() to
meson_pwm_request()
On 25/05/2019 20:11, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> All existing PWM drivers (except pwm-meson and two other ones) call
> pwm_set_chip_data() from their pwm_ops.request() callback. Now that we
> can access the struct meson_pwm_channel from struct meson_pwm we can do
> the same.
>
> Move the call to pwm_set_chip_data() to meson_pwm_request() and drop the
> custom meson_pwm_add_channels(). This makes the implementation
> consistent with other drivers and makes it slightly more obvious
> thatpwm_get_chip_data() cannot be used from pwm_ops.get_state() (because
> that's called by the PWM core before pwm_ops.request()).
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> index ac7e188155fd..27915d6475e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> @@ -98,12 +98,16 @@ static inline struct meson_pwm *to_meson_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>
> static int meson_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> - struct meson_pwm_channel *channel = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
> + struct meson_pwm_channel *channel;
> struct device *dev = chip->dev;
> int err;
>
> - if (!channel)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + channel = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> + if (channel)
> + return 0;
> +
> + channel = &meson->channels[pwm->hwpwm];
>
> if (channel->clk_parent) {
> err = clk_set_parent(channel->clk, channel->clk_parent);
> @@ -124,7 +128,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>
> chip->ops->get_state(chip, pwm, &channel->state);
>
> - return 0;
> + return pwm_set_chip_data(pwm, channel);
> }
>
> static void meson_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> @@ -460,14 +464,6 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void meson_pwm_add_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson)
> -{
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < meson->chip.npwm; i++)
> - pwm_set_chip_data(&meson->chip.pwms[i], &meson->channels[i]);
> -}
> -
> static int meson_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct meson_pwm *meson;
> @@ -503,8 +499,6 @@ static int meson_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return err;
> }
>
> - meson_pwm_add_channels(meson);
> -
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, meson);
>
> return 0;
>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists