linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero references

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190527160618.GT2650@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 27 May 2019 18:06:18 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero
 references

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:15:09PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > index 967352d32af1..9e2a4ab6c731 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > @@ -3637,6 +3637,11 @@ print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct task_struct *curr,
> >  
> >  static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read);
> >  
> > +static int hlock_reference(int reference)
> > +{
> > +	return reference ? : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This gets called for every mutex_lock*()/spin_lock*() operation.
> >   * We maintain the dependency maps and validate the locking attempt:
> > @@ -3702,17 +3707,15 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
> >  	if (depth) {
> >  		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1;
> >  		if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) {
> > -			if (hlock->references) {
> > -				/*
> > -				 * Check: unsigned int references overflow.
> > -				 */
> > -				if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references == UINT_MAX))
> 
> What tree is this against? Afaict this is still 12 bits ?!
> 
> > -					return 0;
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Check: unsigned int references overflow.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock_reference(hlock->references) >
> > +						UINT_MAX - hlock_reference(references)))
> 
> Idem. Also very weird overflow check..
> 
> > +				return 0;
> >  
> > -				hlock->references++;
> > -			} else {
> > -				hlock->references = 2;
> > -			}
> > +			hlock->references = hlock_reference(hlock->references) +
> > +					    hlock_reference(references);
> >  
> >  			return 2;
> >  		}

I think you wanted something like this: ?

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3731,6 +3731,11 @@ print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct t
 
 static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read);
 
+static inline int hlock_references(struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	return hlock->references ? : 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * This gets called for every mutex_lock*()/spin_lock*() operation.
  * We maintain the dependency maps and validate the locking attempt:
@@ -3796,17 +3801,14 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep
 	if (depth) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1;
 		if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) {
-			if (hlock->references) {
-				/*
-				 * Check: unsigned int references:12, overflow.
-				 */
-				if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references == (1 << 12)-1))
-					return 0;
-
-				hlock->references++;
-			} else {
-				hlock->references = 2;
-			}
+			if (!references)
+				references++;
+
+			hlock->references = hlock_references(hlock) + references;
+
+			/* Overflow */
+			if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references < references))
+				return 0;
 
 			return 2;
 		}