[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCAYaLd60ABFxEB28p4J7FO1PRaTZ+N6Ak1AnizAKGaxnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 19:52:49 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] pwm: meson: add the meson_pwm_channel data to
struct meson_pwm
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 8:11 PM Martin Blumenstingl
<martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -509,18 +509,13 @@ static int meson_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> meson->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
> meson->chip.ops = &meson_pwm_ops;
> meson->chip.base = -1;
> - meson->chip.npwm = 2;
> + meson->chip.npwm = MESON_NUM_PWM;
I messed this up during rebase, the macro name is actually MESON_NUM_PWMS
I'll re-send a fix so these patches can be bisected cleanly (patch 8
fixes this typo accidentally)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists