linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] vfs: Add a mount-notification facility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 01:23:36 +0200
From:   Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, raven@...maw.net,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] vfs: Add a mount-notification facility

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:04 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > It might make sense to redesign this stuff so that watches don't hold
> > references on the object being watched.
>
> I explicitly made it hold a reference so that if you place a watch on an
> automounted mount it stops it from expiring.
>
> Further, if I create a watch on something, *should* it be unmountable, just as
> if I had a file open there or had chdir'd into there?

I don't really know. I guess it depends on how it's being used? If
someone decides to e.g. make a file browser that installs watches for
a bunch of mountpoints for some fancy sidebar showing the device
mounts on the system, or something like that, that probably shouldn't
inhibit unmounting... I don't know if that's a realistic use case.