linux-kernel - Re: linusw/for-next boot bisection: v5.2-rc1-8-g73a790c68d7e on rk3288-veyron-jaq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 10:45:13 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>, mgalka@...labora.com,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linusw/for-next boot bisection: v5.2-rc1-8-g73a790c68d7e on rk3288-veyron-jaq

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:36 AM Guillaume Tucker
<guillaume.tucker@...labora.com> wrote:

> > Can't you mark this as a known issue, to prevent spending cycles on the
> > same bisection, and sending out more bisection reports for the same
> > issue?
>
> Not really, so I've disabled bisections in the linux-gpio tree
> and a few other maintainers' trees for now.  I'll see if we can
> come up with a more systematic way of suppressing bisections in
> similar cases (i.e. the issue has been fixed in mainline later
> than the base commit for the branch being tested).

I think this is what the zeroday autobuilder does because
they never seem to show this problem. Thanks for looking
into it!

Yours,
Linus Walleij