lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528085948.GB27906@krava>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 10:59:48 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf header: Add die information in CPU topology

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:41:19PM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:

SNIP

> @@ -88,7 +138,7 @@ static int build_cpu_topology(struct cpu_topology *tp, int cpu)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void cpu_topology__delete(struct cpu_topology *tp)
> +void cpu_topology__delete(struct cpu_topology *tp, bool has_die)
>  {
>  	u32 i;
>  
> @@ -98,17 +148,22 @@ void cpu_topology__delete(struct cpu_topology *tp)
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < tp->core_sib; i++)
>  		zfree(&tp->core_siblings[i]);
>  
> +	if (has_die) {

I think there's no need for has_die check in here,
tp->die_sib will be zero, and also will tp->die_siblings[i]

jirka

> +		for (i = 0 ; i < tp->die_sib; i++)
> +			zfree(&tp->die_siblings[i]);
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < tp->thread_sib; i++)
>  		zfree(&tp->thread_siblings[i]);
>  
>  	free(tp);
>  }

SNIP

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ