lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190528094051.22840-2-imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 12:40:51 +0300
From:   Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero references

The sequence

	static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class);

	struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx;
	struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a;
	struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b;
	struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c;
	struct mutex lock_c;

	ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class);

	ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class);
	ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class);
	ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class);

	mutex_init(&lock_c);

	ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx);

	mutex_lock(&lock_c);

	ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx);
	ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx);

	mutex_unlock(&lock_c);	(*)

	ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c);
	ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b);
	ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a);

	ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**)

will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling
mutex_release() at **:

	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0)

The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the
references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've
updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and
ww_lock_[abc]).

Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into
account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we
merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into).

v2: (Peter)
- Rebase on latest upstream tree.
- Sanitize overflow check and hlock_references() helper.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 7a48649ce6bc..1aa6dff3c12c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -3638,6 +3638,11 @@ print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct task_struct *curr,
 
 static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read);
 
+static inline int hlock_references(struct held_lock *hlock)
+{
+	return hlock->references ? : 1;
+}
+
 /*
  * This gets called for every mutex_lock*()/spin_lock*() operation.
  * We maintain the dependency maps and validate the locking attempt:
@@ -3703,17 +3708,14 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 	if (depth) {
 		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1;
 		if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) {
-			if (hlock->references) {
-				/*
-				 * Check: unsigned int references:12, overflow.
-				 */
-				if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references == (1 << 12)-1))
-					return 0;
+			if (!references)
+				references++;
 
-				hlock->references++;
-			} else {
-				hlock->references = 2;
-			}
+			hlock->references = hlock_references(hlock) + references;
+
+			/* Overflow */
+			if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references < references))
+				return 0;
 
 			return 2;
 		}
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ