[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528100413.GA20809@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:13 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: wire up VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Wire up the code introduced in v5.2 to manage the permissions
> of executable vmalloc regions (and their linear aliases) more
> strictly.
>
> One of the things that came up in the internal discussion is
> whether non-x86 architectures have any benefit at all from the
> lazy vunmap feature, and whether it would perhaps be better to
> implement eager vunmap instead.
>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> Ard Biesheuvel (4):
> arm64: module: create module allocations without exec permissions
> arm64/mm: wire up CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
> arm64/kprobes: set VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on kprobe instruction pages
> arm64: bpf: do not allocate executable memory
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 3 ++
> arch/arm64/kernel/module.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
> mm/vmalloc.c | 11 -----
> 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Thanks, this all looks good to me. I can get pick this up for 5.2 if
Rick's fixes [1] land soon enough.
Cheers,
Will
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190527211058.2729-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/T/#u
Powered by blists - more mailing lists