lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14c6c702-844b-756d-2d97-44e8f5a169df@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 13:05:13 +0300
From:   Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 0/4] omapdrm: DSI command mode panel support

On 28/05/2019 12:39, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com> [190528 09:19]:
>> On 27/05/2019 14:21, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>
>>>> Looks good to me. For some reason I can't boot 5.2-rc2 (on x15) so I haven't
>>>> been able to test yet. I'll pick the series up in any case, and I'll test it
>>>> when I get the kernel booting.
>>>
>>> Great good to have these merged finally :)
>>>
>>> Hmm I wonder if some x15 models are affected by the SoC variant
>>> changes queued in my fixes branch?
>>
>> This is what I see with earlycon, on linux-omap fixes branch. I think this looks
>> similar to what I saw with dra76 _without_ the fixes.
> 
> OK sounds like we need to use some different SoC specific .dtsi file,
> is this maybe x15 rev c?
> 
> You can detect which modules fail based on the module base address
> for revision register seen with the following debug patch. Then
> those need to be tagged with status = "disabled" at the module
> level in the SoC specific dtsi file.

[    1.370609] ti-sysc 4ae20000.target-module: probing device

This change lets me boot. I don't know that's the correct place, though:

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am5728.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am5728.dtsi
index 82e5427ef6a9..c778f9a86b3a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am5728.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am5728.dtsi
@@ -31,3 +31,7 @@
 &atl_tm {
        status = "disabled";
 };
+
+&timer12 {
+       status = "disabled";
+};

My board is x15 rev A3, attached to AM5 EVM. I've also attached my kernel
config.

 Tomi

-- 
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

View attachment ".config" of type "text/plain" (126847 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ