[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu-guJaWDrEp5=KeJsje6Teo-V=_AhFStf0gnLk-QNfzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 15:46:49 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, ezequiel@...labora.com,
treding@...dia.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 19:26, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 19:08, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/13/19 3:32 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Do you see test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
> > > kernel branches ?
> >
> > Probably related to commit 8a7c5594c0202 (media: v4l2-ioctl: clear fields in s_parm).
>
> I have cherry-picked on stable rc 4.9 branch and tested and test got
> PASS on x86_64.
I have cherry-picked for stable -rc 4.14 and 4.9 and test got PASS.
do you want to queue this for stable rc 4.14 and 4.9 ?
I have tested for 4.4 with patch applied but failed with below error.
test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
warn: ../../../v4l-utils-1.16.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1237):
S_PARM is supported but doesn't report V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME
fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.16.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1139):
node->has_frmintervals && !cap->capability
test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL
4.4 - failed log
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/746548#L1678
ref:
4.14 pass log,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/739126#L1843
4.9 pass log,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/736243#L1744
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists