[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mvmr28idgfu.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:25:09 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub
On Mai 28 2019, Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz> wrote:
> I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with
> attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall
> fails with EINVAL.
Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists