[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874l5f9vy7.fsf@babayev.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 19:03:44 -0700
From: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
xe-linux-external@...co.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
Wolfram Sang writes:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 05:53:01PM -0700, Ruslan Babayev wrote:
>> This allows drivers to lookup i2c adapters on ACPI based systems similar to
>> of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node() with DT based systems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Babayev <ruslan@...ayev.com>
>> Cc: xe-linux-external@...co.com
>
> Please have a look how your patches look in my inbox:
>
> May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 129) [PATCH] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
> May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) ├─>[PATCH 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
> May 24 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) └─>[PATCH net-next v2 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
> May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) [PATCH net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 3) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next] Enable SFP support on ACPI
> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 65) ├─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 1/2] i2c: acpi: export i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle
> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 120) └─>[PATCH RFC v2 net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
> May 07 Ruslan Babayev ( 154) └─&─>
> May 07 Ruslan Babayev ( 10) └─>
> May 22 Ruslan Babayev ( 29) └─>
> May 05 Ruslan Babayev ( 93) [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: sfp: enable i2c-bus detection on ACPI based systems
> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 25) ├─&─>
> May 06 Ruslan Babayev ( 99) └─&─>
>
> This is highly confusing, and super hard to find out which patches belong
> together. v2 2/2 seems even missing. Please resend this as a new series without
> any in-reply-to, and a fresh cover-letter, so I know which one to apply to my
> tree.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wolfram
Will do, sorry about that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists