[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528135012.GR2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 15:50:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf/x86/intel: Set correct weight for TopDown
metrics events
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 02:40:51PM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The topdown metrics and slots events are mapped to a fixed counter,
> but should have the normal weight for the scheduler.
You forgot the 'why/because' part of that sentence.
> So special case this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists