[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528145411.GA709@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 15:54:11 +0100
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 05/17] arms64: untag user pointers passed to memory
syscalls
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:37:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 06:30:51PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to
> > pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other
> > than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
> >
> > This patch allows tagged pointers to be passed to the following memory
> > syscalls: brk, get_mempolicy, madvise, mbind, mincore, mlock, mlock2,
> > mmap, mmap_pgoff, mprotect, mremap, msync, munlock, munmap,
> > remap_file_pages, shmat and shmdt.
> >
> > This is done by untagging pointers passed to these syscalls in the
> > prologues of their handlers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
>
> Actually, I don't think any of these wrappers get called (have you
> tested this patch?). Following commit 4378a7d4be30 ("arm64: implement
> syscall wrappers"), I think we have other macro names for overriding the
> sys_* ones.
What is the value in adding these wrappers?
The untagged_addr macro is defined for all in linux/mm.h and these patches
already use untagged_addr in generic code. Thus adding a few more
untagged_addr in the generic syscall handlers (which turn to a nop for most)
is surely better than adding wrappers?
Even if other architectures implement untagged_addr in the future it would
be more consistent if they untagged in the same places and thus not adding
these wrappers enforces that.
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
>
> --
> Catalin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists