[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528150424.tjbaiptpjhzg7y75@ca-dmjordan1.us.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:24 -0400
From: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: add account_locked_vm utility function
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 02:51:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 13:50:45 -0400 Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > locked_vm accounting is done roughly the same way in five places, so
> > unify them in a helper. Standardize the debug prints, which vary
> > slightly, but include the helper's caller to disambiguate between
> > callsites.
> >
> > Error codes stay the same, so user-visible behavior does too. The one
> > exception is that the -EPERM case in tce_account_locked_vm is removed
> > because Alexey has never seen it triggered.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -1564,6 +1564,25 @@ long get_user_pages_unlocked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages,
> > unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages);
> >
> > +int __account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages, bool inc,
> > + struct task_struct *task, bool bypass_rlim);
> > +
> > +static inline int account_locked_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pages,
> > + bool inc)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (pages == 0 || !mm)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > + ret = __account_locked_vm(mm, pages, inc, current,
> > + capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK));
> > + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> That's quite a mouthful for an inlined function. How about uninlining
> the whole thing and fiddling drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c to suit.
> I wonder why it does down_write_killable and whether it really needs
> to...
Sure, I can uninline it. vfio changelogs don't show a particular reason for
_killable[1]. Maybe Alex has something to add. Otherwise I'll respin without
it since the simplification seems worth removing _killable.
[1] 0cfef2b7410b ("vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists