lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 17:14:07 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...nel.org,
        Wu Fangsuo <fangsuowu@...micro.com>,
        Pankaj Suryawanshi <pankaj.suryawanshi@...fochips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix trying to reclaim unevicable LRU page

[Cc Pankaj Suryawanshi who has reported a similar problem
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/SG2PR02MB309806967AE91179CAFEC34BE84B0@SG2PR02MB3098.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com]

On Fri 24-05-19 16:11:14, Minchan Kim wrote:
> There was below bugreport from Wu Fangsuo.
> 
> 7200 [  680.491097] c4 7125 (syz-executor) page:ffffffbf02f33b40 count:86 mapcount:84 mapping:ffffffc08fa7a810 index:0x24
> 7201 [  680.531186] c4 7125 (syz-executor) flags: 0x19040c(referenced|uptodate|arch_1|mappedtodisk|unevictable|mlocked)
> 7202 [  680.544987] c0 7125 (syz-executor) raw: 000000000019040c ffffffc08fa7a810 0000000000000024 0000005600000053
> 7203 [  680.556162] c0 7125 (syz-executor) raw: ffffffc009b05b20 ffffffc009b05b20 0000000000000000 ffffffc09bf3ee80
> 7204 [  680.566860] c0 7125 (syz-executor) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page))
> 7205 [  680.578038] c0 7125 (syz-executor) page->mem_cgroup:ffffffc09bf3ee80
> 7206 [  680.585467] c0 7125 (syz-executor) ------------[ cut here ]------------
> 7207 [  680.592466] c0 7125 (syz-executor) kernel BUG at /home/build/farmland/adroid9.0/kernel/linux/mm/vmscan.c:1350!
> 7223 [  680.603663] c0 7125 (syz-executor) Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> 7224 [  680.611436] c0 7125 (syz-executor) Modules linked in:
> 7225 [  680.616769] c0 7125 (syz-executor) CPU: 0 PID: 7125 Comm: syz-executor Tainted: G S              4.14.81 #3
> 7226 [  680.626826] c0 7125 (syz-executor) Hardware name: ASR AQUILAC EVB (DT)
> 7227 [  680.633623] c0 7125 (syz-executor) task: ffffffc00a54cd00 task.stack: ffffffc009b00000
> 7228 [  680.641917] c0 7125 (syz-executor) PC is at shrink_page_list+0x1998/0x3240
> 7229 [  680.649144] c0 7125 (syz-executor) LR is at shrink_page_list+0x1998/0x3240
> 7230 [  680.656303] c0 7125 (syz-executor) pc : [<ffffff90083a2158>] lr : [<ffffff90083a2158>] pstate: 60400045
> 7231 [  680.666086] c0 7125 (syz-executor) sp : ffffffc009b05940
> ..
> 7342 [  681.671308] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90083a2158>] shrink_page_list+0x1998/0x3240
> 7343 [  681.679567] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90083a3dc0>] reclaim_clean_pages_from_list+0x3c0/0x4f0
> 7344 [  681.688793] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff900837ed64>] alloc_contig_range+0x3bc/0x650
> 7347 [  681.717421] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90084925cc>] cma_alloc+0x214/0x668
> 7348 [  681.724892] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90091e4d78>] ion_cma_allocate+0x98/0x1d8
> 7349 [  681.732872] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90091e0b20>] ion_alloc+0x200/0x7e0
> 7350 [  681.740302] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90091e154c>] ion_ioctl+0x18c/0x378
> 7351 [  681.747738] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90084c6824>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x17c/0x1780
> 7352 [  681.755514] c0 7125 (syz-executor) [<ffffff90084c7ed4>] SyS_ioctl+0xac/0xc0
> 
> Wu found it's due to [1]. Before that, unevictable page goes to cull_mlocked
> routine so that it couldn't reach the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE line.
> 
> To fix the issue, this patch filter out unevictable LRU pages
> from the reclaim_clean_pages_from_list in CMA.

The changelog is rather modest on details and I have to confess I have
little bit hard time to understand it. E.g. why do not we need to handle
the regular reclaim path?

> [1] ad6b67041a45, mm: remove SWAP_MLOCK in ttu
> 
> Cc: <stable@...nel.org>	[4.12+]
> Reported-debugged-by: Wu Fangsuo <fangsuowu@...micro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index d9c3e873eca6..7350afae5c3c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ unsigned long reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, page_list, lru) {
>  		if (page_is_file_cache(page) && !PageDirty(page) &&
> -		    !__PageMovable(page)) {
> +		    !__PageMovable(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
>  			ClearPageActive(page);
>  			list_move(&page->lru, &clean_pages);
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.22.0.rc1.257.g3120a18244-goog
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists