[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528112956.4cf2dd9c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:29:56 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: Avoid memory leak in predicate_parse()
On Tue, 28 May 2019 17:18:59 +0200
Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com> wrote:
> >> + memset(prog_stack, 0, nr_preds * sizeof(*prog_stack));
> >> +
> >
> > Can you instead just switch the allocation of prog_stack to use
> > kcalloc()?
>
> kmalloc_array() is safe against arithmetic overflow of the arguments.
> Using kcalloc() directly we wouldn't check for that. Not really ideal in
> my opinion. And there's no kcalloc_array() apparently!
But doesn't kcalloc() simply call kmalloc_array() with the GFP_ZERO
flag?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists