[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9330.1559060541@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:22:21 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, jose.bollo@....bzh,
Linux Security Module list
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Restore the smackfsdef mount option
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> > Also, should all of these be prefixed with "smack"? So:
> >
> > fsparam_string("smackfsdef", Opt_fsdefault),
> > fsparam_string("smackfsfloor", Opt_fsfloor),
> > fsparam_string("smackfshat", Opt_fshat),
>
> No. smack_fs_parameters takes care of that.
It does? *Blink*.
smack_fs_parameters.name is just for decorating messages, if that's what
you're looking at.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists