linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for v5.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 09:55:22 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for v5.2

On 5/28/19 9:44 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 1:44 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The outstanding commits are the Intel fixes [..]
> 
> Heh. Swedism? "Outstanding" in English means "exceptionally good". I
> suspect you meant commits that "står ut", which translates to "stands
> out".
> 
> Or maybe the commits really are _that_ good?

third definition:
continuing in existence; remaining unsettled, unpaid, etc.:

i.e., missing.


-- 
~Randy