[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190528173815.2km65nchedfumslt@esperanza>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 20:38:16 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] mm: fix /proc/kpagecgroup interface for slab pages
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:07:35PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Switching to an indirect scheme of getting mem_cgroup pointer for
> !root slab pages broke /proc/kpagecgroup interface for them.
>
> Let's fix it by learning page_cgroup_ino() how to get memcg
> pointer for slab pages.
>
> Reported-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++++-
> mm/slab.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/slab_common.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
What about mem_cgroup_from_kmem, see mm/list_lru.c?
Shouldn't we fix it, too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists