linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 15:06:11 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, mhocko@...e.com,
        ira.weiny@...el.com, david@...hat.com, cai@....pw,
        logang@...tatee.com, james.morse@....com, cpandya@...eaurora.org,
        arunks@...eaurora.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, osalvador@...e.de,
        ard.biesheuvel@....com, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/3] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove

On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:46:24 +0530 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:

> This series enables memory hot remove on arm64 after fixing a memblock
> removal ordering problem in generic __remove_memory() and one possible
> arm64 platform specific kernel page table race condition. This series
> is based on latest v5.2-rc2 tag.

Unfortunately this series clashes syntactically and semantically with
David Hildenbrand's series "mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out memory block
devicehandling".  Could you and David please figure out what we should
do here?