[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190529163052.6ce91581@lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:30:52 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] docs: Convert VFS doc to RST
On Wed, 15 May 2019 10:29:04 +1000
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org> wrote:
> Here is an updated version of the VFS doc conversion. This series in no
> way represents a final point for the VFS documentation rather it is a
> small step towards getting VFS docs updated. This series does not
> update the content of vfs.txt, only does formatting.
I've finally gotten to this, sorry for taking so long. Applying it to
docs-next turned out to be a bit of a chore; there have been intervening
changes to vfs.txt that we didn't want to lose. But I did it.
Unfortunately, there's still a remaining issue. You did a lot of list
conversions like this:
> - struct file_system_type *fs_type: describes the filesystem, partly initialized
> +``struct file_system_type *fs_type``: describes the filesystem, partly initialized
> by the specific filesystem code
but that does not render the way you would like, trust me. You really
want to use the list format, something like:
``struct file_system_type *fs_type``
describes the filesystem, partly initialized by the specific
filesystem code
There are, unfortunately, a lot of these to fix... I bet it could be done
with an elisp function, but I don't have time to beat my head against that
wall right now.
Any chance you would have time to send me a followup patch fixing these
up? I'll keep my branch with this set for now so there's no need to
rebase those.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists