linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM: qcom: initial Nexus 5 display support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZu5KxKTMqAM5rueWbrXbfPNorOOerezCAA3vgAR6cD5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 08:23:17 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM: qcom: initial Nexus 5 display support

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:17 AM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:

> It's in low speed mode but its usable.

How low speed is that?

> I assume that it's related to the
> vblank events not working properly?

They are only waiting for 50 ms before timing out, I raised it
to 100ms in the -next kernel. I'm still suspicious about this
even though I think you said this was not the problem.

For a command mode panel in LP mode it will nevertheless
be more than 100ms for sure, the update is visible to the
naked eye.

Raise it to 10000 ms or something and see what happens.
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c:
 msecs_to_jiffies(50)

Yours,
Linus Walleij