[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqt6zZ0SHXddLoQMoO3LHT=50Br0x4r3Wn4XviypRxRUtn9zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 12:39:27 +0530
From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fail when offset == num in first check of vm_map_pages_zero()
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 1:38 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> If the user asks us for offset == num, we should already fail in the
> first check, i.e. the one testing for offsets beyond the object.
>
> At the moment, we are failing on the second test anyway,
> since count cannot be 0. Still, to agree with the comment of the first
> test, we should first there.
I think, we need to cc linux-mm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index ddf20bd0c317..74cf8b0ce353 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@ static int __vm_map_pages(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page **pages,
> int ret, i;
>
> /* Fail if the user requested offset is beyond the end of the object */
> - if (offset > num)
> + if (offset >= num)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> /* Fail if the user requested size exceeds available object size */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists