linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/25] vfs: Implement parameter value retrieval with fsinfo() [ver #13]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpegutheVtnmN6BFSjzrmz8p9+DpZxFoKa4CoShoh4MW+5gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 10:08:58 +0200
From:   Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/25] vfs: Implement parameter value retrieval with
 fsinfo() [ver #13]

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 5:11 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Implement parameter value retrieval with fsinfo() - akin to parsing
> /proc/mounts.
>
> This allows all the parameters to be retrieved in one go with:
>
>         struct fsinfo_params params = {
>                 .request        = FSINFO_ATTR_PARAMETER,
>         };

Ah, here it is.

>
> Each parameter comes as a pair of blobs with a length tacked on the front
> rather than using separators, since any printable character that could be
> used as a separator can be found in some value somewhere (including comma).
> In fact, cifs allows the separator to be set using the "sep=" option in
> parameter parsing.
>
> The length on the front of each blob is 1-3 bytes long.  Each byte has a
> flag in bit 7 that's set if there are more bytes and clear on the last
> byte; bits 0-6 should be shifted and OR'd into the length count.  The bytes
> are most-significant first.
>
> For example, 0x83 0xf5 0x06 is the length (0x03<<14 | 0x75<<7 | 0x06).

Sounds way too complicated.  What about fixed 4byte sizes?  Or using
the nul charater as separator (and binary blobs be damned)?

[...]

> +static void fsinfo_insert_sb_flag_parameters(struct path *path,
> +                                            struct fsinfo_kparams *params)
> +{
> +       int s_flags = READ_ONCE(path->dentry->d_sb->s_flags);
> +
> +       if (s_flags & SB_DIRSYNC)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "dirsync", NULL);
> +       if (s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "lazytime", NULL);
> +       if (s_flags & SB_MANDLOCK)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "mand", NULL);
> +       if (s_flags & SB_POSIXACL)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "posixacl", NULL);
> +       if (s_flags & SB_RDONLY)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "ro", NULL);
> +       if (s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
> +               fsinfo_note_param(params, "sync", NULL);

Again, don't blindly transform s_flags into options, because some of
them may have been internally manipulated by the filesystem.

You could do a helper for filesystems that does the the common ones
(ro/sync/dirsync) but all of that *should* go through the filesystem.

Same goes for vfs_parse_sb_flag() btw.   It should be moved into each
filesystem's ->parse_param() and not be a mandatory thing.

Thanks,
Miklos