[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1559118496.4226.11.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 16:28:16 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
CC: "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: mediatek: fix unbind functions
Hi, Hsin-Yi:
On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 15:06 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:35 AM CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think mtk_dsi_destroy_conn_enc() has much thing to do and I would like
> > you to do more. You could refer to [2] for complete implementation.
> >
> > [2]
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c?h=v5.2-rc2#n1575
> >
> Hi CK,
>
> Since drm_encoder_cleanup() would already call drm_bridge_detach() to
> detach bridge, I think we only need to handle panel case here.
> We don't need to call mtk_dsi_encoder_disable() since
> mtk_output_dsi_disable() is called in mtk_dsi_remove() and
> dsi->enabled will be set to false. Calling second time will just
> returns immediately.
> So, besides setting
>
> dsi->panel = NULL;
> dsi->conn.status = connector_status_disconnected;
Sorry, I think your original patch is good enough, and you need not to
do the besides setting.
Regards,
CK
>
> are there other things we need to do here?
>
> Original code doesn't have drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(), and I'm not
> sure if mtk dsi would need this.
> Also, mtk_dsi_stop() would also stop irq.
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists