[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <419f62f3-69a8-7ec0-5eeb-20bed69925f2@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 03:24:14 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@...el.com>, rkrcmar@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jingqi.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: add support for user wait instructions
On 24/05/19 09:56, Tao Xu wrote:
> +7.19 KVM_CAP_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE
> +
> +Architectures: x86
> +Parameters: args[0] whether feature should be enabled or not
> +
> +With this capability enabled, a VM can use UMONITOR, UMWAIT and TPAUSE
> +instructions. If the instruction causes a delay, the amount of
> +time delayed is called here the physical delay. The physical delay is
> +first computed by determining the virtual delay (the time to delay
> +relative to the VM’s timestamp counter). Otherwise, UMONITOR, UMWAIT
> +and TPAUSE cause an invalid-opcode exception(#UD).
> +
There is no need to make it a capability. You can just check the guest
CPUID and see if it includes X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists