[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb63bdfe-e863-2041-9b90-81b423f92baa@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:29:10 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Software fwnode references
Hi,
On 5/22/19 12:50 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not splitting this series in two after all. After thinking about
> this for some time, I decided to add support for static software
> nodes. I did not want to support them because I don't want to make it
> easy to maintain board files, but in end they make the use of the
> software nodes so much more easier compared to if we always had to
> dynamically allocate them that it's a no-brainer. The references can
> now be also described statically. Actually, those can now only be
> described statically.
>
> Hans! I applied (hopefully) all of the fixes you proposed in v3. I
> hope you have time to test these.
I've just ran various tests with the entire series applied and
everything (superspeed host, superspeed device, DP over Type-C,
PD charging) seems to work fin, so you can add my:
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To the entire series.
I've 2 very minor nitpicks about the intel_cht_int33fe patches,
with those fixed, you can also add my:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To the intel_cht_int33fe patches. I will reply to the
2 individual patches for which I've some remarks
separately.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists