[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13970.1559127310@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 11:55:10 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
raven@...maw.net, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] vfs: Add a mount-notification facility
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > + /* Global root? */
> > + if (mnt != parent) {
> > + cursor.dentry = READ_ONCE(mnt->mnt_mountpoint);
> > + mnt = parent;
> > + cursor.mnt = &mnt->mnt;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + break;
>
> (nit: this would look clearer if you inverted the condition and wrote
> it as "if (mnt == parent) break;", then you also wouldn't need that
> "continue" or the braces)
It does look better with the logic inverted, but you *do* still need the
continue. After the if-statement, there is:
cursor.dentry = cursor.dentry->d_parent;
which we need to skip. It might make sense to move that into an
else-statement from an aesthetic point of view.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists