[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190529120219.GS2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:02:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs. hibernation triple fault
during resume
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:32:02PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> arch/x86/power/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/cpu.h | 2 ++
> kernel/cpu.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
> index a7d966964c6f..513ce09e9950 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
> @@ -299,7 +299,17 @@ int hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable(void)
> * address in its instruction pointer may not be possible to resolve
> * any more at that point (the page tables used by it previously may
> * have been overwritten by hibernate image data).
> + *
> + * First, make sure that we wake up all the potentially disabled SMT
> + * threads which have been initially brought up and then put into
> + * mwait/cpuidle sleep.
> + * Those will be put to proper (not interfering with hibernation
> + * resume) sleep afterwards, and the resumed kernel will decide itself
> + * what to do with them.
> */
> + ret = cpuhp_smt_enable();
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> smp_ops.play_dead = resume_play_dead;
> ret = disable_nonboot_cpus();
> smp_ops.play_dead = play_dead;
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists