linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190529124120.GF4485@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 13:41:20 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64/mm: Fixes and cleanups for do_page_fault()

Hi Anshuman,

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 06:04:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series contains some fixes and cleanups for page fault handling in
> do_page_fault(). This has been boot tested on arm64 platform along with
> some stress test but just build tested on others.

These all seem to be cleanups, which is fine, but I just wanted to make
sure I'm not missing something that should be aiming for 5.2. Are there
actually fixes in this series?

(in future, it's best to post fixes separately so I don't miss them)

Cheers,

Will