linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] General notification queue with user mmap()'able ring buffer [ver #13]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29055.1559135525@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 14:12:05 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] General notification queue with user mmap()'able ring buffer [ver #13]

Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:

> Would it make sense to use relayfs for the implementation of the
> mapped ring buffer?

Note that I reposted the notification patches under the correct cover note
later.  Could you repost your response there.

Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications

David