linux-kernel - [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Remove negations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190529131531.6368-1-nishkadg.linux@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 18:45:31 +0530
From:   Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, qader.aymen@...il.com,
        kim.jamie.bradley@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org
Cc:     Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Remove negations

Previously return variable fake_para was being negated before return.
For simplification, fake_para can be changed to valid_para, which is
returned without negation (corresponding values swapped accordingly).
Further, the function names check_sd_current_prior and check_sd_speed_prior
can be changed to valid_sd_current_prior and valid_sd_speed_prior
respectively for greater clarity on the purpose of the functions.

Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
index 76c35f3c0208..17c4131f5f62 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_chip.c
@@ -598,38 +598,38 @@ int rtsx_reset_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
 	return STATUS_SUCCESS;
 }
 
-static inline int check_sd_speed_prior(u32 sd_speed_prior)
+static inline int valid_sd_speed_prior(u32 sd_speed_prior)
 {
-	bool fake_para = false;
+	bool valid_para = true;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
 		u8 tmp = (u8)(sd_speed_prior >> (i * 8));
 
 		if ((tmp < 0x01) || (tmp > 0x04)) {
-			fake_para = true;
+			valid_para = false;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 
-	return !fake_para;
+	return valid_para;
 }
 
-static inline int check_sd_current_prior(u32 sd_current_prior)
+static inline int valid_sd_current_prior(u32 sd_current_prior)
 {
-	bool fake_para = false;
+	bool valid_para = true;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
 		u8 tmp = (u8)(sd_current_prior >> (i * 8));
 
 		if (tmp > 0x03) {
-			fake_para = true;
+			valid_para = false;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 
-	return !fake_para;
+	return valid_para;
 }
 
 static int rts5208_init(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
@@ -796,13 +796,13 @@ int rtsx_init_chip(struct rtsx_chip *chip)
 		chip->rw_fail_cnt[i] = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (!check_sd_speed_prior(chip->sd_speed_prior))
+	if (!valid_sd_speed_prior(chip->sd_speed_prior))
 		chip->sd_speed_prior = 0x01040203;
 
 	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_speed_prior = 0x%08x\n",
 		chip->sd_speed_prior);
 
-	if (!check_sd_current_prior(chip->sd_current_prior))
+	if (!valid_sd_current_prior(chip->sd_current_prior))
 		chip->sd_current_prior = 0x00010203;
 
 	dev_dbg(rtsx_dev(chip), "sd_current_prior = 0x%08x\n",
-- 
2.19.1