linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] docs/gpu: fix a documentation build break in i915.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190529075031.5275d065@lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 07:50:31 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] docs/gpu: fix a documentation build break in
 i915.rst

On Wed, 29 May 2019 08:54:16 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:

> > Documentation/gpu/i915.rst is not included in the TOC tree, but newer
> > versions of sphinx parse it anyway.  That leads to this hard build failure:  
> 
> It is included I think: Documentation/gpu/index.rst -> drivers.rst ->
> i915.rst. With that corrected A-b: me.
> 
> btw this patch didn't go to intel-gfx and all i915 maintainers, I
> think per get_maintainers.pl it should have. Just asking since I had a
> few patches of my own where get_maintainers.pl didn't seem to do the
> right thing somehow.

It is included, just a level down and I wasn't paying attention.

In any case, this patch needs to be dropped; the kerneldoc comment
changes I sent (and Jani acked) are the better fix for this problem.

Thanks,

jon