lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 22:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     david <david@...ma-star.at>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can an ahash driver be used through shash API?

Stephan,

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> I've seen that it does actually work the other way around, since
>> crypto_init_shash_ops_async() in crypto/shash.c takes care of translating
>> calls from ahash to shash and that's how the *-generic drivers are usable
>> through the ahash API.
> 
> The crypto_alloc_shash will only identify cipher implementations that were
> registered with the CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_SHASH flag. That flag is set when a cipher
> is registered using crypto_register_shash.
> 
> Thus, ciphers registered with crypto_register_ahash will not bear this flag
> and thus will not be found by the allocation function.

is there a reason why we don't emulate the synchronous functionality
in the crypto API layer if a driver implements only the async interface?

Or is it just a matter of -ENOPATCH? :)

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ