lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190530030545.160094086@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 20:01:20 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.1 082/405] ACPI / property: fix handling of data_nodes in acpi_get_next_subnode()

[ Upstream commit 23583f7795025e3c783b680d906509366b0906ad ]

When the DSDT tables expose devices with subdevices and a set of
hierarchical _DSD properties, the data returned by
acpi_get_next_subnode() is incorrect, with the results suggesting a bad
pointer assignment. The parser works fine with device_nodes or
data_nodes, but not with a combination of the two.

The problem is traced to an invalid pointer used when jumping from
handling device_nodes to data nodes. The existing code looks for data
nodes below the last subdevice found instead of the common root. Fix
by forcing the acpi_device pointer to be derived from the same fwnode
for the two types of subnodes.

This same problem of handling device and data nodes was already fixed
in a similar way by 'commit bf4703fdd166 ("ACPI / property: fix data
node parsing in acpi_get_next_subnode()")' but broken later by 'commit
34055190b19 ("ACPI / property: Add fwnode_get_next_child_node()")', so
this should probably go to linux-stable all the way to 4.12

Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/property.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index 77abe0ec40431..bd533f68b1dec 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -1031,6 +1031,14 @@ struct fwnode_handle *acpi_get_next_subnode(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 		const struct acpi_data_node *data = to_acpi_data_node(fwnode);
 		struct acpi_data_node *dn;
 
+		/*
+		 * We can have a combination of device and data nodes, e.g. with
+		 * hierarchical _DSD properties. Make sure the adev pointer is
+		 * restored before going through data nodes, otherwise we will
+		 * be looking for data_nodes below the last device found instead
+		 * of the common fwnode shared by device_nodes and data_nodes.
+		 */
+		adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode);
 		if (adev)
 			head = &adev->data.subnodes;
 		else if (data)
-- 
2.20.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ