[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190530064131.GA29291@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 08:41:31 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Maciej Rozycki <macro@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"mick@....forth.gr" <mick@....forth.gr>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] byteorder: sanity check toolchain vs kernel
endianess
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:46:18AM +0000, Maciej Rozycki wrote:
> > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ != __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> > +#error "Unsupported endianess, check your toolchain"
>
> Typo here: s/endianess/endianness/.
The original patch has already been merged, please send a fixup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists