[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190530120718.52xuxgezkzsmaxqi@box>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 15:07:18 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, hughd@...gle.com,
shakeelb@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:44:22PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index bc74d6a..9ff5fab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -316,6 +316,12 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> struct list_head event_list;
> spinlock_t event_list_lock;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> + struct list_head split_queue;
> + unsigned long split_queue_len;
> + spinlock_t split_queue_lock;
Maybe we should wrap there into a struct and have helper that would return
pointer to the struct which is right for the page: from pgdat or from
memcg, depending on the situation?
This way we will be able to kill most of code duplication, right?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists