[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bc749161a8b8640ebdf78d693111d5350514638.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 06:04:00 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: hhhawa@...zon.com, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, bp@...en8.de,
mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, paulmck@...ux.ibm.com,
dwmw@...zon.co.uk, benh@...zon.com, ronenk@...zon.com,
talel@...zon.com, jonnyc@...zon.com, hanochu@...zon.com,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs EDAC
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 15:52 +0300, hhhawa@...zon.com wrote:
> On 5/30/19 2:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:15:29PM +0300, Hanna Hawa wrote:
> > > +static void al_a57_edac_cpumerrsr(void *arg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct edac_device_ctl_info *edac_dev =
> > > + (struct edac_device_ctl_info *)arg;
> > No need for casting anything here, just assign it. Doesn't checkpatch
> > catch this type of thing these days? You did run it, right?
>
> I did, but checkpatch didn't catch this. I'll fix in next patch-set.
>
> Thanks for your review.
checkpatch is brainless about the types of variables/arguments.
coccinelle is another very useful tool so you could also run
scripts/coccicheck on your sources.
see: Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists