linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ghak90 V6 08/10] audit: add containerid filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 10:34:49 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        sgrubb@...hat.com, omosnace@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        simo@...hat.com, Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak90 V6 08/10] audit: add containerid filtering

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:20 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-29 18:16, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:41 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Implement audit container identifier filtering using the AUDIT_CONTID
> > > field name to send an 8-character string representing a u64 since the
> > > value field is only u32.
> > >
> > > Sending it as two u32 was considered, but gathering and comparing two
> > > fields was more complex.
> > >
> > > The feature indicator is AUDIT_FEATURE_BITMAP_CONTAINERID.
> > >
> > > Please see the github audit kernel issue for the contid filter feature:
> > >   https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/91
> > > Please see the github audit userspace issue for filter additions:
> > >   https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/issues/40
> > > Please see the github audit testsuiite issue for the test case:
> > >   https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64
> > > Please see the github audit wiki for the feature overview:
> > >   https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> > > Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/audit.h      |  1 +
> > >  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |  5 ++++-
> > >  kernel/audit.h             |  1 +
> > >  kernel/auditfilter.c       | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  kernel/auditsc.c           |  4 ++++
> > >  5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > index 63f8b3f26fab..407b5bb3b4c6 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
> > > @@ -1206,6 +1224,31 @@ int audit_comparator(u32 left, u32 op, u32 right)
> > >         }
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +int audit_comparator64(u64 left, u32 op, u64 right)
> > > +{
> > > +       switch (op) {
> > > +       case Audit_equal:
> > > +               return (left == right);
> > > +       case Audit_not_equal:
> > > +               return (left != right);
> > > +       case Audit_lt:
> > > +               return (left < right);
> > > +       case Audit_le:
> > > +               return (left <= right);
> > > +       case Audit_gt:
> > > +               return (left > right);
> > > +       case Audit_ge:
> > > +               return (left >= right);
> > > +       case Audit_bitmask:
> > > +               return (left & right);
> > > +       case Audit_bittest:
> > > +               return ((left & right) == right);
> > > +       default:
> > > +               BUG();
> >
> > A little birdy mentioned the BUG() here as a potential issue and while
> > I had ignored it in earlier patches because this is likely a
> > cut-n-paste from another audit comparator function, I took a closer
> > look this time.  It appears as though we will never have an invalid op
> > value as audit_data_to_entry()/audit_to_op() ensure that the op value
> > is a a known good value.  Removing the BUG() from all the audit
> > comparators is a separate issue, but I think it would be good to
> > remove it from this newly added comparator; keeping it so that we
> > return "0" in the default case seems reasoanble.
>
> Fair enough.  That BUG(); can be removed.

Please send a fixup patch for this.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com