[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871s0grlzo.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:38:19 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, dbueso@...e.de, axboe@...nel.dk, dave@...olabs.net,
e@...24.org, jbaron@...mai.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-aio@...ck.org, omar.kilani@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pselect/etc semantics
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> Which means I believe we have a semantically valid change in behavior
> that is causing a regression.
I haven't made a survey of all of the functions yet but
fucntions return -ENORESTARTNOHAND will never return -EINTR and are
immune from this problem.
AKA pselect is fine. While epoll_pwait can be affected.
Has anyone contacted Omar Kilani to see if that is his issue?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+8F9hicnF=kvjXPZFQy=Pa2HJUS3JS+G9VswFHNQQynPMHGVQ@mail.gmail.com/
So far the only regression report I am seeing is from Eric Wong.
AKA https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190501021405.hfvd7ps623liu25i@dcvr/
Are there any others? How did we get to be talking about more
than just epoll_pwait?
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists