[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190530205540.GA5308@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:55:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
Cc: hans.verkuil@...co.com, mchehab@...nel.org, code@...ofe.uk,
ezequiel@...labora.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: davinci_vpfe: Remove variable vpfe_dev
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 02:17:18AM +0530, Nishka Dasgupta wrote:
> Remove variable vpfe_dev and replace it with its value (since the
> function otherwise uses values directly instead of local variables).
This says _what_ you do. But we can see that in the patch itself.
You need to say _why_ you are doing this.
There's no need for this change at all. Again, as I have said before,
we write code for developers to read first, the compiler second. By
making these types of changes you are making it harder to
read/understand by a developer, and providing absolutely no benifit to
the compiler at all.
So it's actually making the code worse!
not good at all.
Please reconsider this type of change, as I keep asking you to.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists