linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: kpc2000: add missing dependencies for kpc2000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190530210107.GA22336@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 14:01:07 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: kpc2000: add missing dependencies for
 kpc2000

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Simon Sandström wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 10:39:18AM +0200, Simon Sandström wrote:
> > On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 07:00:17AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is already in linux-next (in a different form), are you sure you
> > > are working against the latest kernel tree?
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > It's based on your staging tree. I think that I have to go back and read
> > about next trees again, because I thought it took longer time for things
> > to get from staging-next to linux-next.
> > 
> > Anyway, neither the MFD_CORE nor the typo fix is in linux-next so I
> > guess that I could just rebase this on linux-next and re-send as v2.
> > I'm not sure if MFD_CORE should be "depends on" or "select" though...
> > 
> > 
> > - Simon
> 
> Oh, it must be "select MFD_CORE" because there is no prompt for
> MFD_CORE? Should I just rebase it on linux-next and re-send as v2 then?

Yes please.