[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1905301425330.2265@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 14:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs. hibernation triple fault
during resume
On Thu, 30 May 2019, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.19+
> > Debugged-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Fixes: 0cc3cd21657b ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>
> LGTM
>
> And I would prefer this one to go in through the PM tree due to the
> hibernate core changes,
Ok.
> so can I get an ACK from the x86 arch side here, please?
No. Is the following good enough?
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists