[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190530231735.n7so5mhec72xjmhm@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 00:17:35 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: smp: Include smp_plat.h from smp.h
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:14:28PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/30/19 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Hi ARM64 maintainers,
> >
> > This patch series aims at enabling irq-bcm7038-l1.c on
> > ARM64/ARCH_BRCMSTB, this driver makes use of cpu_logical_map[] and in
> > order to avoid adding a CONFIG_ARM64 conditional inclusion of
> > smp_plat.h, instead smp.h includes smp_plat.h, which is in turn included
> > by linux/smp.h.
> >
> > If you like the approach, I would suggest to carry that through the
> > Broadcom ARM64 SoC pull request for 5.3.
>
> ARM (32-bit) needs the same thing kind of thing so a conditional include
> may be appropriate after all...
The whole idea of the smp_plat.h vs smp.h separation is to avoid
including lots of arch-private stuff in the rest of the kernel
build, thereby exposing arch-private stuff to the world. I'm be
opposed to that.
>
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Florian Fainelli (2):
> > arm64: smp: Include smp_plat.h from smp.h
> > arm64: Enable BCM7038_L1_IRQ for ARCH_BRCMSTB
> >
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
>
>
> --
> Florian
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists