linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround for FU540-C000 SoC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 09:25:14 +0530
From:   Sagar Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, peter@...sgaard.com,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] i2c-ocores: sifive: add polling mode workaround
 for FU540-C000 SoC.

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:23 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 09:57:27AM +0530, Sagar Shrikant Kadam wrote:
> > The i2c-ocore driver already has a polling mode interface.But it needs
> > a workaround for FU540 Chipset on HiFive unleashed board (RevA00).
> > There is an erratum in FU540 chip that prevents interrupt driven i2c
> > transfers from working, and also the I2C controller's interrupt bit
> > cannot be cleared if set, due to this the existing i2c polling mode
> > interface added in mainline earlier doesn't work, and CPU stall's
> > infinitely, when-ever i2c transfer is initiated.
> >
> > Ref:
> >       commit dd7dbf0eb090 ("i2c: ocores: refactor setup for polling")
> >
> > The workaround / fix under OCORES_FLAG_BROKEN_IRQ is particularly for
> > FU540-COOO SoC.
> >
> > The polling function identifies a SiFive device based on the device node
> > and enables the workaround.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@...ive.com>
>
> Hi Sagar
>
> When you repost, you are supposed to add any reviewed-by, or acked-by
> tags you received.

Sorry Andrew, I missed it.
I will repost it, with acked by Andrew Lunn as you had Acknowledged it earlier
>
>      Andrew

Thanks,
Sagar