[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190530030538.201874533@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:06:07 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 209/276] x86/uaccess: Fix up the fixup
[ Upstream commit b69656fa7ea2f75e47d7bd5b9430359fa46488af ]
New tooling got confused about this:
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: .fixup+0x7: return with UACCESS enabled
While the code isn't wrong, it is tedious (if at all possible) to
figure out what function a particular chunk of .fixup belongs to.
This then confuses the objtool uaccess validation. Instead of
returning directly from the .fixup, jump back into the right function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
index 3b24dc05251c7..9d05572370edc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ ENTRY(__memcpy_mcsafe)
/* Copy successful. Return zero */
.L_done_memcpy_trap:
xorl %eax, %eax
+.L_done:
ret
ENDPROC(__memcpy_mcsafe)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__memcpy_mcsafe)
@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__memcpy_mcsafe)
addl %edx, %ecx
.E_trailing_bytes:
mov %ecx, %eax
- ret
+ jmp .L_done
/*
* For write fault handling, given the destination is unaligned,
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists