linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv2 6/6] mm: extend process_madvise syscall to support vector arrary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 1 Jun 2019 08:18:59 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...gle.com>,
        Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, jannh@...gle.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, christian@...uner.io, oleksandr@...hat.com,
        hdanton@...a.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 6/6] mm: extend process_madvise syscall to support vector
 arrary

Hi Yann,

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:06:52PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le vendredi 31 mai 2019 à 15:43 +0900, Minchan Kim a écrit :
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > index 92e347a89ddc..220c2b5eb961 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > @@ -75,4 +75,15 @@
> >  #define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK	(PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> >  				 PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> >  
> > +struct pr_madvise_param {
> > +	int size;		/* the size of this structure */
> > +	int cookie;		/* reserved to support atomicity */
> > +	int nr_elem;		/* count of below arrary fields */
> 
> Those should be unsigned.
> 
> There's an implicit hole here on ABI with 64bits aligned pointers
> 
> > +	int __user *hints;	/* hints for each range */
> > +	/* to store result of each operation */
> > +	const struct iovec __user *results;
> > +	/* input address ranges */
> > +	const struct iovec __user *ranges;
> 
> Using pointer type in uAPI structure require a 'compat' version of the
> syscall need to be provided.
> 
> If using iovec too.

I will fix them when I submit next revision.
Thanks for the review.