linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 17/19] mips: Add support for generic vDSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 10:34:59 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc:     linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/19] mips: Add support for generic vDSO

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:16 PM Vincenzo Frascino
<vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:

> --- a/arch/mips/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/mips/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@ VERSION
>         global:
>                 __vdso_clock_gettime;
>                 __vdso_gettimeofday;
> +               __vdso_clock_getres;
> +#if _MIPS_SIM != _MIPS_SIM_ABI64
> +               __vdso_clock_gettime64;
> +#endif
>  #endif
>         local: *;
>         };

Same comment as for the corresponding arm change: I'd leave the ABI
changes to a separate patch, and probably not add __vdso_clock_getres
at all.

Also, you seem to have a typo here:

> +notrace int __vdso_clock_gettime_time64(clockid_t clock,
> +                                struct __kernel_timespec *ts)
> +{
> +       return __cvdso_clock_gettime(clock, ts);
> +}

This should be __vdso_clock_gettime64, not __vdso_clock_gettime_time64 I think.

       Arnd