lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 17:11:56 -0700
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Matt Sickler <Matt.Sickler@...tronics.com>
Cc:     Simon Sandström <simon@...anor.nu>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: kpc2000: add spaces around operators in
 core.c

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:57:09PM +0000, Matt Sickler wrote:
> >From: devel <driverdev-devel-bounces@...uxdriverproject.org> On Behalf Of
> >Greg KH
> >On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Simon Sandström wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc2000/core.c
> >> @@ -276,18 +276,18 @@ static ssize_t kp2000_cdev_read(struct file *filp,
> >
> >This whole function just needs to be deleted, it's a horrible hack.
> 
> >From the outside, I would definitely agree with you.  On the inside though, we
> rely on this function to quickly identify what kind and version is running on
> a given piece of hardware.  Since that same information is provided by an ioctl,
> I could be convinced to remove this API and write a userspace application that
> uses the ioctl to get the information and pretty prints it.

The ioctl needs to die as well, just use the sysfs entries instead, as
you already have them :)

> I'd be more inclined to agree with the deletion if it means the whole char dev
> interface can be removed from the kpc2000 driver.  That won't be straightforward
> as the ioctl is exposed through this interface.  We could remove the ioctl, but
> we'd need to ensure that all the same information is exposed via sysfs.

I think you are there already, what is missing?

> Our userspace side is all funneled through a single class, so changing
> it to use sysfs wouldn't be too difficult.  I'd support that change if
> someone wants to make it.

I will be glad to do that, it's always nice to delete code :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ